That’s really weird. I have tested WordAI and Spin Rewriter with Copyscape and the results were always 80%+ uniquness, even 90%+. I don’t know how u spun the content to achieve such low results, but this is definitely way too bad. As for the block spinning, I have to be honest, this is the first time I’m hearing of it and I will have to check it out when I have a bit of time, but generally, yes, in the best case scenario, you would manually touch your Tier 1 content to make it 100% human readable and as unique as possible. For lower tiers, you can do pretty much anything, but again, the better quality of content, the better results you will have. That’s in my opinion and experience.
The most useful thing to do is always to locate a listing that perhaps not only pays you for your original post but one that additionally provides continuing residuals for every period your article gets read. The recurring might not be world-shattering but if you've got a group of articles that regularly get read afterward your fee may be worth the difficulty.
By the way, I check all these spins and compare them using DiffChecker in order to easily see what has changed. And as you can see, the “Turing” spinner of WordAI really focuses on rewriting the structure and flow of the sentences of the content as opposed to focusing on exchanging words with synonyms, which is of course why the result content is extremely human readable.
It’s just okay. Maybe I expected too much but it did not save me much time at all with all the changes I had to make to the articles. I used it on the “readable” setting and allowed it to automatically spin paragraphs, sentences, etc. Well it was actually “readable” but not human readable, also there is option for human readable articles, but it will be not 100% unique.
Hey Cathy, thanks for sharing about WordAi. It certainly is interesting, to say the least. I guess at some point all of us would want to automate our business and will look into programs like these for a solution. The example you showed gave me a very clear indication that the algorithm isn’t quite there yet. You seem too lenient in grading it because to me, it is practically unreadable. I believe hiring writers is a better use of that money.
In this harsh industry who can't implement a small number of extra profit? Another upside will be that you can construct right up your cache of primary subject material and help to increase your good reputation for posting and potentially attract some more significant paying users. Lastly, simply just believe that of the experience you can be developing by owning to groundwork some of the ideas you generate about. You can be, or will be soon, a fountain of inadequate information.
Would you ask somebody who does not talk great English and has no capabilities or experience to revamp site content? No? All things considered, this is precisely what many individuals do when they go to some modest administrations or specifically procure the least expensive specialists that they can discover, The final product is regularly add up to refuse that has unmistakably been composed by somebody that does not see either the subject or the dialect. Far more detestable it will regularly fall flat a literary theft checker which will cause you real issues with the web search tools.
This will no doubt seem very obvious to many people and for others it will send a shudder of fear down their spine! But if you want to make money online, be an affiliate marketer or a well known blogger, then there really is only one way to do it. The best way to get ranked and make money online is to do must things manually. Sure, there are legit shortcuts and additional tools that can make the process faster. But in general if you are looking to create content for your website, then you need to learn the correct way of doing it.